Further Conclusions from Hadow – Understanding the School as a Society of Learners

This is Part 3 of our series of posts on the Hadow Report and its contribution to the history of education.


On reading these further extracts from the Introduction to the 1931 Hadow report on Primary education our readers will undoubtedly notice the similarities between the prevailing views described by the report’s authors and those of many of our contemporary commentators and practitioners who insist Primary education should focus on “the basics” and ensure that no time or effort is wasted and nothing should “distract”children from reaching the arbitrary academic targets set out in the current testing regime – in order that they become “secondary ready”, and even, “ready for the world of work”.

Clearly the Hadow committee wished to offer a very different opinion as to the purposes of the Primary school and the true nature of its engagement with children aged 7 to 11.

Man is a social animal, and the school is a society. The school, being organised and equipped for the purpose, is able to offer fuller and more varied opportunities for activity than is possible for a single family. The teacher, with his special knowledge and experience, is in a position to see that the activities are fruitful, and that the child is helped to pass from one to another as he is ready for it. A good school, in short, is not a place of compulsory instruction, but a community of old and young, engaged in learning by co-operative experiment.

collaborative learning 2

Approached from this angle, the problem of the curriculum is seen in a somewhat different light from that in which it was envisaged even as recently as a generation ago.

It has passed in the last hundred years through three main phases, which of course overlap. In the age before the establishment of a public educational system, when even some of those who agreed that it was desirable that children should learn to read, ‘if only for the best of purposes, that they may read the Scriptures,’ were doubtful if it was desirable to teach them to write, since ‘such a degree of knowledge might produce in them a disrelish for the laborious occupations of life,’ questions of curriculum were naturally not a burning issue.

collaborative learning 3

In the period immediately preceding and following 1870, the period of the Revised Code and the early school boards, the dominant – and, indeed it is hardly an exaggeration to say, the exclusive – concern of most schools was to secure that children acquired a minimum standard of proficiency in reading, writing, and arithmetic, subjects in which their attainments were annually assessed by quantitative standards, with a view to the allocation to schools of pecuniary rewards and penalties.

During the last forty years, and with increasing rapidity in the twelve years since 1918, the outlook of the primary school has been broadened and humanised. Today it includes care, through the school medical service, for the physical welfare of children, offers larger, if still inadequate, opportunities for practical activity, and handles the curriculum, not only as consisting of lessons to be mastered, but as providing fields of new and interesting collaborative learning 4experience to be explored; it appeals less to passive obedience and more to the sympathy, social spirit and imagination of the children, relies less on mass instruction and more on the encouragement of individual and group work, and treats the school, in short, not as the antithesis of life, but as its complement and commentary.

[3Di  italics and underlines]

To be continued . . .

collaborative learning

About 3D Eye

Gary Foskett and Clare Blackhall are educationalists, writers and consultants. We work with schools and other organisations who share our vision of how schools, businesses, etc should work in the 21st Century. We also run courses and contribute to conferences - speaking about our three dimensional model of intelligences and how schools, colleges and universities can develop the full potential of all their staff and students. We also offer consultancy for businesses and public sector organisations to support staff training and organisational change and development. For more detailed information read our blog at https://3diassociates.wordpress.com/ or see our website at www.3diassociates.com.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Please leave a comment - and tell others about 3Di!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s